Are you ruled today by actual humans smarter than yourself? There’s a scaling issue (humans can’t copy their mind-state and execute many copies in parallel), but the underlying premise is very questionable. Human-level intelligence (even the top end of the range) does not make other humans their “proxy”.
Sure, but populism isn’t generally the pathway given for AI takeover. If the gist of the post is that human-level chatbots make bad economic intuitions even more compelling, that wasn’t clear to me.
Are you ruled today by actual humans smarter than yourself? There’s a scaling issue (humans can’t copy their mind-state and execute many copies in parallel), but the underlying premise is very questionable. Human-level intelligence (even the top end of the range) does not make other humans their “proxy”.
Taboo ‘smarter’ and ‘ruled by’ and I think you get closer then you might expect. We are haunted by bad political and economic theory
Sure, but populism isn’t generally the pathway given for AI takeover. If the gist of the post is that human-level chatbots make bad economic intuitions even more compelling, that wasn’t clear to me.
Is this perhaps because the top end is simply not high enough yet?