I think the conclusion I take from it is ~”There’s a bunch of individual people who were involved with CFAR still doing interesting stuff, but there is no such public organisation anymore in a meaningful sense (although shards of the organisation still help with AIRCS workshops); so you have to follow these individual people to find out what they’re up to. Also, there is no concentration of force working towards a public accessible rationality curriculum anymore.”
This seems about right to me personally, although as noted there is some network / concentration of force working toward… things individuals affiliated with us see as worth working toward, in loose coordination. (But “a publicly accessible rationality curriculum” is not a thing we’ve been concentrating force toward, so far.)
This seems about right to me personally, although as noted there is some network / concentration of force working toward… things individuals affiliated with us see as worth working toward, in loose coordination. (But “a publicly accessible rationality curriculum” is not a thing we’ve been concentrating force toward, so far.)