The problem (or at least a problem) with seeing moderation this way is that moderators who are aware of the concepts at all tend to say that criticism of arbitrary moderation amounts to criticism for not being open—in other words, once you accept that openness is a bad idea, pretty much anything the moderators do becomes justified on that basis.
The problem (or at least a problem) with seeing moderation this way is that moderators who are aware of the concepts at all tend to say that criticism of arbitrary moderation amounts to criticism for not being open—in other words, once you accept that openness is a bad idea, pretty much anything the moderators do becomes justified on that basis.