Science and Sanity contains a lot of good insights that aren’t in the sequences. The problem is that it’s not an accessible book. It hard to read and a substantial time investment.
Do you think this is an intrinsic property of the insights, or could someone compress the book in to something shorter, more readable, and almost as useful?
I don’t think the problem is that the book is long. It’s that it basically defines it’s own language and is written in that language. It’s similar to a math textbook defining terms and then using those terms.
It defines for example the term “semantic reaction” and then goes to abbreviate it as s.r
The gist is that if you say something the meaning of what you say is the reaction that happens in the brain of your listener when he hears the words.
It’s not hard to understand that definition on a superficial level. On the other hand it’s hard to really integrate it.
It’s a fundamental concept used throughout the book.
Science and Sanity contains a lot of good insights that aren’t in the sequences. The problem is that it’s not an accessible book. It hard to read and a substantial time investment.
Do you think this is an intrinsic property of the insights, or could someone compress the book in to something shorter, more readable, and almost as useful?
I don’t think the problem is that the book is long. It’s that it basically defines it’s own language and is written in that language. It’s similar to a math textbook defining terms and then using those terms.
It defines for example the term “semantic reaction” and then goes to abbreviate it as s.r The gist is that if you say something the meaning of what you say is the reaction that happens in the brain of your listener when he hears the words.
It’s not hard to understand that definition on a superficial level. On the other hand it’s hard to really integrate it. It’s a fundamental concept used throughout the book.