“If you think this is a simplistic or distorted version of what EY is saying, you are not paying attention. If you think that EY is merely saying that an AGI can kill a big fraction of humans in accident and so on but there will be survivors, you are not paying attention.”
Not sure why this functions as a rebuttal to anything i’m saying.
Sorry, it is true that I wasn’t clear enough and that I misread part of your comment. I would love to give you a properly detailed answer right now but I need to go, will come back to this later
“If you think this is a simplistic or distorted version of what EY is saying, you are not paying attention. If you think that EY is merely saying that an AGI can kill a big fraction of humans in accident and so on but there will be survivors, you are not paying attention.”
Not sure why this functions as a rebuttal to anything i’m saying.
Sorry, it is true that I wasn’t clear enough and that I misread part of your comment. I would love to give you a properly detailed answer right now but I need to go, will come back to this later