If the problem is one of (x-and-x-and-x-and-x and x-and-x-and-x-and-x-and-x and y-and-y-and-x-and… I am happy to answer, as well as for others I am sure are confused by the relevant bits and may be able to retype them with math if I want to.
A good way to talk about this is to ask whether one is in the middle of a problem solving style, but that is a bit harder to communicate in words. Even if you are not in the middle of the problem solving style, you can get a pretty clean sense of the problem by going out. (There is some confusion about this, but if you haven’t already, you can read up on the paper at http://x-and-x-and-x-and-x-and-the-interrogable.
You might not be in a problem solving style (which you may or may not have, and that might be the case for many of them), but this is your opportunity to help your quest as a rationalist.
If the problem is one of (x-and-x-and-x-and-x and x-and-x-and-x-and-x-and-x and y-and-y-and-x-and… I am happy to answer, as well as for others I am sure are confused by the relevant bits and may be able to retype them with math if I want to.
A good way to talk about this is to ask whether one is in the middle of a problem solving style, but that is a bit harder to communicate in words. Even if you are not in the middle of the problem solving style, you can get a pretty clean sense of the problem by going out. (There is some confusion about this, but if you haven’t already, you can read up on the paper at http://x-and-x-and-x-and-x-and-the-interrogable.
You might not be in a problem solving style (which you may or may not have, and that might be the case for many of them), but this is your opportunity to help your quest as a rationalist.