I’ve been reading the sequences, and so far it seems very good. If a math textbook is worth reading, I think it is.
Here’s some specific things I have taken from the sequences, all relevant to this:
The ability to calculate your points.
For instance, you might find someone who gives a much more concrete example of how to calculate a point, and some example how to calculate (e.g. a calculator).
A set of fixed point questions:
how fast would you attempt to figure out the answer if you had to read a given textbook
how long would you have to try to answer the question if you had to read a given textbook?
how long would you have to answer the question if you had to read a given textbook?
A set of fixed point questions: how fast you could estimate something if 1) and 2) the material changed in response to it
The ability to estimate something’s “true likelihood” rather than just being a guess.
The ability to calculate something’s probability
The ability to calculate something’s probability
The ability to calculate something’s expected sample
The ability to calculate something’s “expected sample”
The ability to calculate something’s “true sample”
The ability to calculate something’s “true sample”
The ability to calculate something’s “true score”
The ability to calculate something’s “true score”
The ability to calculate something’s true score
The ability to calculate anything’s true score
The ability to calculate something’s true score
The ability to estimate something’s true score
The ability to estimate something’s true true score
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution
That ability to verify a set of correct conformance to another function
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution.
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution if it were a function of a function that could have been written down in the same language as mathematical proofs of the underlying mathematics: Bounded versions of formal probability theories, Bounded versions, “unknown unknowns”
The ability to construct an updated probability distribution using LBO1, b
I’ve been reading the sequences, and so far it seems very good. If a math textbook is worth reading, I think it is.
Here’s some specific things I have taken from the sequences, all relevant to this:
The ability to calculate your points. For instance, you might find someone who gives a much more concrete example of how to calculate a point, and some example how to calculate (e.g. a calculator).
A set of fixed point questions:
how fast would you attempt to figure out the answer if you had to read a given textbook
how long would you have to try to answer the question if you had to read a given textbook?
how long would you have to answer the question if you had to read a given textbook?
A set of fixed point questions: how fast you could estimate something if 1) and 2) the material changed in response to it
The ability to estimate something’s “true likelihood” rather than just being a guess.
The ability to calculate something’s probability
The ability to calculate something’s probability
The ability to calculate something’s expected sample
The ability to calculate something’s “expected sample”
The ability to calculate something’s “true sample”
The ability to calculate something’s “true sample”
The ability to calculate something’s “true score”
The ability to calculate something’s “true score”
The ability to calculate something’s true score
The ability to calculate anything’s true score
The ability to calculate something’s true score
The ability to estimate something’s true score
The ability to estimate something’s true true score
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution
That ability to verify a set of correct conformance to another function
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution.
The ability to derive an updated probability distribution if it were a function of a function that could have been written down in the same language as mathematical proofs of the underlying mathematics: Bounded versions of formal probability theories, Bounded versions, “unknown unknowns”
The ability to construct an updated probability distribution using LBO1, b