That wasn’t just some random paragraph; it was the whole freaking point of the post! It introduced a conceit that was continued throughout the whole rest of the article!
Before accusing me of hindsight bias (or the illusion of transparency, which is what I think you really meant), you might have noticed this reply, which should have put its parent into context immediately, or so I would have thought.
No and yes, respectively. In my defense, your comment is 64th in New order, so it’s not like it was closely juxtaposed with that paragraph.
That wasn’t just some random paragraph; it was the whole freaking point of the post! It introduced a conceit that was continued throughout the whole rest of the article!
Before accusing me of hindsight bias (or the illusion of transparency, which is what I think you really meant), you might have noticed this reply, which should have put its parent into context immediately, or so I would have thought.
Did notice it and it didn’t. Sorry.