Understandable, I edited in clearer references—did that resolve all the issues? I’m not sure in return that I parsed all your issues parsing :) I appreciate the specific request!
It helps! There are still some double negatives (“His claims about safety must therefore not rely on ai not surpassing humans, or be false” could be reworded to “his claims about safety can only be true if they allow for AI surpassing humans,” for example), and I, not being a superintelligence, would find that easier to parse :)
The “pointers” bit is mostly fixed by you replacing the word “this” with the phrase “the claim that ai can starkly surpass humans.” Thank you for the edits!
Understandable, I edited in clearer references—did that resolve all the issues? I’m not sure in return that I parsed all your issues parsing :) I appreciate the specific request!
It helps! There are still some double negatives (“His claims about safety must therefore not rely on ai not surpassing humans, or be false” could be reworded to “his claims about safety can only be true if they allow for AI surpassing humans,” for example), and I, not being a superintelligence, would find that easier to parse :)
The “pointers” bit is mostly fixed by you replacing the word “this” with the phrase “the claim that ai can starkly surpass humans.” Thank you for the edits!