Yes. People achieve better results if they cooperate, but they are judged by what they do if they are not allowed to cooperate.
This system has an advantage of safety—you can replace anyone in your organization and it keeps working, because everyone has some level of all the necessary skills. (You will never get stuck with the illiterate researcher and nobody to help them write.) So maybe I just underestimate the value of the safety. But maybe the system underestimates the opportunity costs.
Yes. People achieve better results if they cooperate, but they are judged by what they do if they are not allowed to cooperate.
This system has an advantage of safety—you can replace anyone in your organization and it keeps working, because everyone has some level of all the necessary skills. (You will never get stuck with the illiterate researcher and nobody to help them write.) So maybe I just underestimate the value of the safety. But maybe the system underestimates the opportunity costs.