I don’t mind any number of people replying “Updated”. So, yes, I would prefer that over a count of some small number of ‘standard reactions’.
But, as I suggested in another comment on this post, external survey tools could be easily used to gather this data or feedback if you or anyone else really think it’s valuable or useful.
I would like to see some evidence about how well those work and how useful that gathered data is before I change my mind about this being useful here.
We want to lower the bar to providing feedback so we can get more feedback
I don’t want this as I don’t think ‘more feedback’ is particularly useful, valuable, or germane to this site.
I’m also thinking about this request in terms of additional work, and ongoing maintenance, by the site’s developers/maintainers.
I’m also unclear why anyone would want to (seemingly) optimize for such incredibly low-density info as the count of ‘reacts’ on posts. We are mostly – at times explicitly – trying to avoid persuading each other and instead focus on sharing our (detailed) thoughts and feelings so that we can, as a group, reason better. This all seems exactly backwards given that.
I don’t mind any number of people replying “Updated”. So, yes, I would prefer that over a count of some small number of ‘standard reactions’.
But, as I suggested in another comment on this post, external survey tools could be easily used to gather this data or feedback if you or anyone else really think it’s valuable or useful.
I would like to see some evidence about how well those work and how useful that gathered data is before I change my mind about this being useful here.
I don’t want this as I don’t think ‘more feedback’ is particularly useful, valuable, or germane to this site.
I’m also thinking about this request in terms of additional work, and ongoing maintenance, by the site’s developers/maintainers.
I’m also unclear why anyone would want to (seemingly) optimize for such incredibly low-density info as the count of ‘reacts’ on posts. We are mostly – at times explicitly – trying to avoid persuading each other and instead focus on sharing our (detailed) thoughts and feelings so that we can, as a group, reason better. This all seems exactly backwards given that.