Oops. I meant that for all possible biases torwards heads, not always or never. Except that only has 3⁄4 success.
I’m just saying comparing it to a human is unfair. Humans use feeble subsets of the universal prior that are easy to imitate.
Oops. I meant that for all possible biases torwards heads, not always or never. Except that only has 3⁄4 success.
I’m just saying comparing it to a human is unfair. Humans use feeble subsets of the universal prior that are easy to imitate.