A top-level post would be very welcome, I don’t want to take this one too far off track. I’ve slept (and continue to sleep) with a lot of people, and my experience very much contradicts what you say here.
So you have to be aware that there is a fundamental difference in the objectives of the two which will make it extremely difficult or impossible to make BOTH happy at the same time.
ciphergoth:
my experience very much contradicts what you say here.
That’s because it’s a great example of theory being used to persuade people to take a certain set of “actions that work”. There are other theories that contradict those theories, that are used to get other people to take action… even though the specific actions taken may be quite similar!
People self-select their schools of dating and self-help based on what theories appeal to them, not on the actual actions those schools recommend taking. ;-)
In this case, the theory roland is talking about isn’t theory at all: it’s a sales pitch, that attracts people who feel that dating is an unfair situation. They like what they hear, and they want to hear more. So they read more and maybe buy a product. The writer or speaker then gradually moves from this ev-psych “hook” to other theories that guide the reader to take the actions the author recommends.
That people confuse these sales pitches with actual theory is a well-understood concept within the Marketing Conspiracy. ;-) Of course, the gurus don’t always know themselves what parts of their theories are hook vs. “real”… I just found out recently that a bunch of stuff I thought was “real” was actually “hook”, and had to go through some soul-searching before deciding to leave it in the book I’m writing.
Why? Because if I change the hook, I won’t be able to reach people who have the same wrong beliefs that I did. Better to hook people with wrong things they already believe, and then get them to take the actions that will get them to the place where they can throw off those beliefs. (And of course, believing those things didn’t stop me from making progress.) But I’ve restricted it to being only in chapter 1, and the revelation of the deeper model will happen by chapter 5.
Anyway. Actually helping people change their actions and beliefs—as opposed to merely telling them what they should do or think—is the very Darkest of the Dark arts.
Perhaps we should call it “The Coaching Conspiracy”. ;-)
What exactly would you like to know? The subject is very broad, it would be easier if you made me a list of questions that are relevant to LW. There are already TONS of sites about this topic so please don’t ask me to write another post about seduction in general.
I think a post tailored to the particular interests and language of LW/OB readers would be fairly different from the ones already out there, but if you have a pointer that you think would be particularly appealing to us lot I’m interested.
A top-level post would be very welcome, I don’t want to take this one too far off track. I’ve slept (and continue to sleep) with a lot of people, and my experience very much contradicts what you say here.
roland:
ciphergoth:
That’s because it’s a great example of theory being used to persuade people to take a certain set of “actions that work”. There are other theories that contradict those theories, that are used to get other people to take action… even though the specific actions taken may be quite similar!
People self-select their schools of dating and self-help based on what theories appeal to them, not on the actual actions those schools recommend taking. ;-)
In this case, the theory roland is talking about isn’t theory at all: it’s a sales pitch, that attracts people who feel that dating is an unfair situation. They like what they hear, and they want to hear more. So they read more and maybe buy a product. The writer or speaker then gradually moves from this ev-psych “hook” to other theories that guide the reader to take the actions the author recommends.
That people confuse these sales pitches with actual theory is a well-understood concept within the Marketing Conspiracy. ;-) Of course, the gurus don’t always know themselves what parts of their theories are hook vs. “real”… I just found out recently that a bunch of stuff I thought was “real” was actually “hook”, and had to go through some soul-searching before deciding to leave it in the book I’m writing.
Why? Because if I change the hook, I won’t be able to reach people who have the same wrong beliefs that I did. Better to hook people with wrong things they already believe, and then get them to take the actions that will get them to the place where they can throw off those beliefs. (And of course, believing those things didn’t stop me from making progress.) But I’ve restricted it to being only in chapter 1, and the revelation of the deeper model will happen by chapter 5.
Anyway. Actually helping people change their actions and beliefs—as opposed to merely telling them what they should do or think—is the very Darkest of the Dark arts.
Perhaps we should call it “The Coaching Conspiracy”. ;-)
What exactly would you like to know? The subject is very broad, it would be easier if you made me a list of questions that are relevant to LW. There are already TONS of sites about this topic so please don’t ask me to write another post about seduction in general.
I think a post tailored to the particular interests and language of LW/OB readers would be fairly different from the ones already out there, but if you have a pointer that you think would be particularly appealing to us lot I’m interested.