For example, Kant’s categorical imperative is very close to a decision-theory or game theory approach if one thinks about it as asking “what would happen if everyone made the choice that I do?”
This is like the opposite of game theory. Assuming that everyone takes the same action as you instead of assuming that everyone does what is in their own best interest.
This is like the opposite of game theory. Assuming that everyone takes the same action as you instead of assuming that everyone does what is in their own best interest.
Yes, at some level one can interpret Kant as saying something like “use decision theory, not game theory.”
Quick Question, a few weeks later: would you be willing to take a guess as to what problems might have caused my comment to be downvoted? I’m stumped.
No idea. I’m perplexed. Your comment seemed to me to be accurate and on point.