Oli’s comment is right. Another way of phrasing the question is:
Why do journals purport to contain no errors in any of the papers? Is it because they’re lying about the quality of the papers? Or if there’s a reliable process that removed errors from 100% of papers, can someone tell me what that process was?
You’re right that I misspoke to imply they explicitly claim no errors, I shall correct that in the OP.
However, if I knew a community where nobody ever disagreed with anyone else nor admitted error of their own, I would think this odd. Especially if they purported to be doing science.
Oli’s comment is right. Another way of phrasing the question is:
Edit: I’ve added this to the OP.
Do they actually so purport? Do you just mean that they don’t say, “I am full of errors!”?
This reads to me like the journals are claiming inerrancy, which I don’t think they do. Maybe you meant something else though?
You’re right that I misspoke to imply they explicitly claim no errors, I shall correct that in the OP.
However, if I knew a community where nobody ever disagreed with anyone else nor admitted error of their own, I would think this odd. Especially if they purported to be doing science.