Uncharitable paraphrase of previous post: “Here is someone who seems to have lots of problems. Please identify The Problem (tm)”.
Uncharitable paraphrase of this post: “The Problem is that this person actually has not one problem but many problems.”
So far as I can tell, introducing this business about “The Problem” adds nothing but obfuscation. You encountered someone who seemed to have lots of problems. You concluded that he has lots of problems. Amazing!
That doesn’t mean that these posts are valueless! Even without the “TheProblem (tm)” framing, readers might be tempted to look for a single underlying problem, and being cautioned away from that is useful; and your proposed way of dealing with this sort of big-pile-of-mutually-reinforcing-problems situation may well be a good one. And it’s interesting to read about how you approached the situation. So I’m glad I read these. I just don’t see what the business about “The Problem” was for.
introducing this business about “The Problem” adds nothing but obfuscation.
Point taken. will think about how to better describe the thing.
You encountered someone who seemed to have lots of problems. You concluded that he has lots of problems. Amazing!
Prior to talking me; some of these problems had been around for a number of years. These problems didn’t come from one day to the next; they built up. The spiral problem is maybe better described as a problem with the approach to the rest of the problems. In that sense it’s one that is hard to see when you are too busy tackling the object-level problems...
Uncharitable paraphrase of this post: “The Problem is that this person actually has not one problem but many problems.”
try: “the problem is the person’s other problems are getting in the way of actually fixing any of the problems.”
Uncharitable paraphrase of previous post: “Here is someone who seems to have lots of problems. Please identify The Problem (tm)”.
Uncharitable paraphrase of this post: “The Problem is that this person actually has not one problem but many problems.”
So far as I can tell, introducing this business about “The Problem” adds nothing but obfuscation. You encountered someone who seemed to have lots of problems. You concluded that he has lots of problems. Amazing!
That doesn’t mean that these posts are valueless! Even without the “TheProblem (tm)” framing, readers might be tempted to look for a single underlying problem, and being cautioned away from that is useful; and your proposed way of dealing with this sort of big-pile-of-mutually-reinforcing-problems situation may well be a good one. And it’s interesting to read about how you approached the situation. So I’m glad I read these. I just don’t see what the business about “The Problem” was for.
Point taken. will think about how to better describe the thing.
Prior to talking me; some of these problems had been around for a number of years. These problems didn’t come from one day to the next; they built up. The spiral problem is maybe better described as a problem with the approach to the rest of the problems. In that sense it’s one that is hard to see when you are too busy tackling the object-level problems...
try: “the problem is the person’s other problems are getting in the way of actually fixing any of the problems.”
Yes, that may be a better way to put it.