I’m not sure ‘cute’ is a useful word in facilitating a rational conversation. I certainly had an emotional reaction to it (feeling like I was being patronized) that I had to fight with in order to think clearly.
Anyway, maybe its best to see where we might be disagreeing. Do you believe its true that: 1. there exist experiments where we cannot predict what will happen
In those experiments we can predict what will happen if we run large ensembles of experiments in the same class
If you agree with that- do you think it MIGHT be problematic to use these facts to update in the direction of a fully deterministic theory?
I’m not sure ‘cute’ is a useful word in facilitating a rational conversation. I certainly had an emotional reaction to it (feeling like I was being patronized) that I had to fight with in order to think clearly.
Anyway, maybe its best to see where we might be disagreeing. Do you believe its true that: 1. there exist experiments where we cannot predict what will happen
In those experiments we can predict what will happen if we run large ensembles of experiments in the same class
If you agree with that- do you think it MIGHT be problematic to use these facts to update in the direction of a fully deterministic theory?