I get the sense that you should enjoy learning more physics, and shouldn’t worry about Boltzmann brains again until you at least have a physics-based intuition for whether we expect Boltmann brains or the decay of iron stars to come first.
Thanks for the answer! I have read all the links even if I did not understand much of the first one, of the second I understood that quantum fluctuations do not occur, even if, as I say in the post, I did not understand if the particles in the vacuum can be combined to create macroscopic objects, and what does “via nucleation” mean.
Thanks anyway
I get the sense that you should enjoy learning more physics, and shouldn’t worry about Boltzmann brains again until you at least have a physics-based intuition for whether we expect Boltmann brains or the decay of iron stars to come first.
Still, some links that might interest you:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yzrXFWTAwEWaA7yv5/boltzmann-brains-and-within-model-vs-between-models
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BgXHNa8uEfMKarYG5/link-no-boltzmann-brains-in-an-empty-expanding-universe
https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/solomonoff-induction
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_star
Thanks for the answer! I have read all the links even if I did not understand much of the first one, of the second I understood that quantum fluctuations do not occur, even if, as I say in the post, I did not understand if the particles in the vacuum can be combined to create macroscopic objects, and what does “via nucleation” mean. Thanks anyway