No human has a job as scribe, because literacy is 90%+.
I don’t think that unipolar/multipolar scenarios differ greatly in outcomes.
No human has a job as scribe
Yes, correct. But people have jobs as copywriters, secretaries, etc. People specialize, because that is the optimal way to get stuff done.
Yes, but it doesn’t mean that unspecialized AGI is going to be worse than specialized human.
unspecialized AGI is going to be worse than specialized human.
when did I say that?
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
No human has a job as scribe, because literacy is 90%+.
I don’t think that unipolar/multipolar scenarios differ greatly in outcomes.
Yes, correct. But people have jobs as copywriters, secretaries, etc. People specialize, because that is the optimal way to get stuff done.
Yes, but it doesn’t mean that unspecialized AGI is going to be worse than specialized human.
when did I say that?