I’m not sure a larger population is exactly the best way to go about achieving some of those goals, specifically: “More Geniuses”. I feel as though there is a counterfactual of “More Idiots” and “More Jerks”. I think it’s questionable that “geniuses” even contribute to society a meaningful amount. I think I’d more value a larger amount of people with above current average reasoning and societal productivity (which larger population might actually help with).
I think the positive externalities of one genius are much greater than the negative externalities of one idiot or jerk. A genius can create a breakthrough discovery or invention that elevates the entire human race. Hard for an idiot or jerk to do damage of equivalent magnitude.
Maybe a better argument is “what about more Hitlers or Stalins?” But I still think that looking at the overall history of humanity, it seems that the positives of people outweigh the negatives, or we wouldn’t even be here now.
I’m not sure a larger population is exactly the best way to go about achieving some of those goals, specifically: “More Geniuses”. I feel as though there is a counterfactual of “More Idiots” and “More Jerks”. I think it’s questionable that “geniuses” even contribute to society a meaningful amount. I think I’d more value a larger amount of people with above current average reasoning and societal productivity (which larger population might actually help with).
I think the positive externalities of one genius are much greater than the negative externalities of one idiot or jerk. A genius can create a breakthrough discovery or invention that elevates the entire human race. Hard for an idiot or jerk to do damage of equivalent magnitude.
Maybe a better argument is “what about more Hitlers or Stalins?” But I still think that looking at the overall history of humanity, it seems that the positives of people outweigh the negatives, or we wouldn’t even be here now.
Bryan Caplan addressed this recently here.