It’s interesting to consider whether this should be simplified to “against neutrality”. On what topics does it seem likely that the current instantaneous state is the perfect desirable quantity of anything?
One could just allow “neutral” to mean “acknowledge and respect the forces in equilibrium at the current level.”, which moves the question from “would we want more or would we want less” to “what would we want to change about the environment that would generate more or less”. But it still seems vanishingly unlikely that the answer is “nothing; it’s perfect”.
It’s interesting to consider whether this should be simplified to “against neutrality”. On what topics does it seem likely that the current instantaneous state is the perfect desirable quantity of anything?
One could just allow “neutral” to mean “acknowledge and respect the forces in equilibrium at the current level.”, which moves the question from “would we want more or would we want less” to “what would we want to change about the environment that would generate more or less”. But it still seems vanishingly unlikely that the answer is “nothing; it’s perfect”.