I had my first vaccination with AstraZeneca after which I spent a day in bed. For me second vaccination I had Biontech where I had less energy the next day but not so strong effects as the first one.
It’s quite odd that the side-effects of the vaccines are so different from person to person.
One thing that might explain how the side effects are so different is that maybe for some people the vaccine stays mostly at the point where it was injected and for others it travels more through the body which causes side effects.
I had those ideas before my second vaccination and as a result I made sure to do nothing to relax the side of injection for the 36 hours after injection while I did do so after the first vaccination. I wanted the vaccine in my arm to get immunity but not in my brain getting my body to attack brain cells even if it only kills a nonsignificant amount of them.
This hypothesis is very much guesswork at this point, but the experiment it suggests is very cheap. Just leave the side of injection in the tension it has after injection till the second day after the vaccination.
I’d be curious if other people would try it when they get additional vaccinations while having a lot of side effects with the first vaccination and whether the approach could also reduce side effects for other people.
I had two AZ shots, the first made me spend 12 hours in bed, the second I barely noticed, and as far as I know, in both cases I did the same thing afterwards (waiting for 15 minutes reading a book, then walking home for 30 minutes). So, who knows, maybe the effects of the second vaccines are just weaker in general.
It’s not clear to what claim you are objecting and what source you have for it. Capitalizing Independent Fact Checkers is interesting because it’s a way to admit that we are not talking about independent fact checkers but things that are named that way.
Low levels of mRNA could be detected in all examined tissues except the kidney. This included heart, lung, testis and also brain tissues, indicating that the mRNA/LNP platform crossed the blood/brain barrier
It’s no conspiracy theory to assume that facts in the approval documents for vaccines are true.
This is a forum for rationalists. This means that having arguments is useful for engaging in debates. Appeal to authority (especially when you just assert it) is not what rational discussion is about and contacting moderators because you don’t like arguments being made won’t bring you further.
Open hypnothesis:
I had my first vaccination with AstraZeneca after which I spent a day in bed. For me second vaccination I had Biontech where I had less energy the next day but not so strong effects as the first one.
It’s quite odd that the side-effects of the vaccines are so different from person to person.
One thing that might explain how the side effects are so different is that maybe for some people the vaccine stays mostly at the point where it was injected and for others it travels more through the body which causes side effects.
I had those ideas before my second vaccination and as a result I made sure to do nothing to relax the side of injection for the 36 hours after injection while I did do so after the first vaccination. I wanted the vaccine in my arm to get immunity but not in my brain getting my body to attack brain cells even if it only kills a nonsignificant amount of them.
This hypothesis is very much guesswork at this point, but the experiment it suggests is very cheap. Just leave the side of injection in the tension it has after injection till the second day after the vaccination.
I’d be curious if other people would try it when they get additional vaccinations while having a lot of side effects with the first vaccination and whether the approach could also reduce side effects for other people.
I had two AZ shots, the first made me spend 12 hours in bed, the second I barely noticed, and as far as I know, in both cases I did the same thing afterwards (waiting for 15 minutes reading a book, then walking home for 30 minutes). So, who knows, maybe the effects of the second vaccines are just weaker in general.
On average second shots have higher side-effects because there’s a larger immune response.
That conspiracy theory has already been debunked by Independent Fact Checkers.
It’s not clear to what claim you are objecting and what source you have for it. Capitalizing Independent Fact Checkers is interesting because it’s a way to admit that we are not talking about independent fact checkers but things that are named that way.
From the Assessment report COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna of the European Medical Agency:
It’s no conspiracy theory to assume that facts in the approval documents for vaccines are true.
Sorry but I’m not going to further engage with a conspiracy theorist who’s trying to damage public perception of the jabs. I’ve contacted moderators.
This is a forum for rationalists. This means that having arguments is useful for engaging in debates. Appeal to authority (especially when you just assert it) is not what rational discussion is about and contacting moderators because you don’t like arguments being made won’t bring you further.