I have a new draft for a post on why it makes sense to use rationalist jargon like steelmanning over the existing jargon. This is an experiment whether shortform is a good place to ask for draft feedback:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1slE6_sR82UsssV6eWRgjHNrHgNDsHPSltmbqIypsISU/edit?usp=sharing
What type of feedback are you looking for?
My goal is to bring the post into a better form before I publish it on LessWrong. Feedback that’s helpful for that goal is welcome.
When it comes to discussing the ideas of the post, that seems better once the post is finished, so that the discussion will stay on LessWrong.
I endorse gjm’s final comment 100%. (I wrote a much longer response but eventually decided that it was just repeating what ze said.)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I have a new draft for a post on why it makes sense to use rationalist jargon like steelmanning over the existing jargon. This is an experiment whether shortform is a good place to ask for draft feedback:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1slE6_sR82UsssV6eWRgjHNrHgNDsHPSltmbqIypsISU/edit?usp=sharing
What type of feedback are you looking for?
My goal is to bring the post into a better form before I publish it on LessWrong. Feedback that’s helpful for that goal is welcome.
When it comes to discussing the ideas of the post, that seems better once the post is finished, so that the discussion will stay on LessWrong.
I endorse gjm’s final comment 100%. (I wrote a much longer response but eventually decided that it was just repeating what ze said.)