In was going to say the much the same. I think it kind of is a noncentral fallacy too, but not one that strikes me as problematic.
Perhaps I’d add that I feel the argument/persuasion being made by Eliezer doesn’t really rest on trying to import my valence towards “swindle” over to this. I don’t have that much valence to a funny obscure word.
I guess it has to be said that it’s a noncentral noncentral fallacy.
Agree, good question.
In was going to say the much the same. I think it kind of is a noncentral fallacy too, but not one that strikes me as problematic.
Perhaps I’d add that I feel the argument/persuasion being made by Eliezer doesn’t really rest on trying to import my valence towards “swindle” over to this. I don’t have that much valence to a funny obscure word.
I guess it has to be said that it’s a noncentral noncentral fallacy.