Which is not to say that modeling such technical arguments is not important for forecasting AGI. I certainly could have written a post evaluating such arguments, and I decided to write this post instead, in part because I don’t have much to say on this issue that Gary Marcus hasn’t already said.
Is he an AI researcher though? Wikipedia says he’s a psychology professor, and his arXiv article criticizing deep learning doesn’t seem to have much math. If you have technical arguments, maybe you could state them?
Is he an AI researcher though? Wikipedia says he’s a psychology professor, and his arXiv article criticizing deep learning doesn’t seem to have much math. If you have technical arguments, maybe you could state them?
Yes he is, see his publications. (For technical arguments, see my response to Paul.)