brazil84 comments on White Lies

brazil84 12 Feb 2014 10:13 UTC
3 points

So the potential donor still has complete discretion and thus there is no reason for the doctor to lie.

I disagree. For example, the potential donor might want to lie to spare the feelings of his sibling. Or to forestall family members from getting annoyed at him.

In which case, what would he do if the tests came back positive?

Lie and say he was incompatible. That’s kinda the point of this subthread.

Near as I follow your logic, the reason for lying is that the doctor is trying to protect the patient’s right to over what—if anything—is done with his organs

Not exactly—the reason for the doctor lying is to prevent hurt feelings and family discord.
- Eugine_Nier 13 Feb 2014 2:18 UTC
  −4 points
  Parent
  
  For example, the potential donor might want to lie to spare the feelings of his sibling. Or to forestall family members from getting annoyed at him.
  
  Sparing somebody’s feelings is a much worse reason for lying than protecting their right to bodily autonomy.
  
  In which case, what would he do if the tests came back positive?
  
  Lie and say he was incompatible. That’s kinda the point of this subthread.
  
  I meant what would the donor do if the person refused to lie.
  - brazil84 13 Feb 2014 7:08 UTC
    2 points
    Parent
    
    Sparing somebody’s feelings is a much worse reason for lying than protecting their right to bodily autonomy.
    
    I don’t disagree with you . . . have I suggested otherwise?
    
    I meant what would the donor do if the person refused to lie.
    
    I don’t know, it would be up to the potential donor. But either way he gets to make his decision and nobody in this discussion is disputing that. Agreed?
    
    ETA: Now that I have explained why medical personnel might lie about compatibility, is there any other flaw in your view? At this point, is there anything I have said which you disagree with?