http://lesswrong.com/lw/rs/created_already_in_motion/
That article ultimately comes down to relying on our (evolved) intuition, which is exactly my point.
If you follow unbreakable rules because doing so leads to better outcomes, then you are a consequentialist.
Once you self-modify to always follow those rules, you are no longer a consequentialist.
Do you believe that deontology has a resolution to the aforementioned issues?
Quiet possibly.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
That article ultimately comes down to relying on our (evolved) intuition, which is exactly my point.
Once you self-modify to always follow those rules, you are no longer a consequentialist.
Quiet possibly.