The original title of this post is “RAND doesn’t believe current LLMs are helpful for bioweapons development”. I don’t think it makes sense to ascribe beliefs this specific to an entity as messy and big as RAND. I changed title to something that tries to be informative without making as strong of a presumption (for link posts to posts by off-site authors I take more ownership over how a post is titled, I wouldn’t change the title if the author of the report had created it)
I agreed and upvoted the action here. However, I think I might have made an even stronger edit to be “A RAND report...” to better emphasize the report over the organization within which the report authors work.
The original title of this post is “RAND doesn’t believe current LLMs are helpful for bioweapons development”. I don’t think it makes sense to ascribe beliefs this specific to an entity as messy and big as RAND. I changed title to something that tries to be informative without making as strong of a presumption (for link posts to posts by off-site authors I take more ownership over how a post is titled, I wouldn’t change the title if the author of the report had created it)
Thanks! I like your title more :)
I agreed and upvoted the action here. However, I think I might have made an even stronger edit to be “A RAND report...” to better emphasize the report over the organization within which the report authors work.