Sure, but if you inspect the reasons for this intuitions (mostly “simple things don’t talk”?), you find that they may just as easily imply different kind of consciousness instead of absence of consciousness.
This sounds like the naive theodicy that reconciles the existence of evil with the goodness of God by saying that God is indeed good, but in ways we cannot understand.
This sounds like the naive theodicy that reconciles the existence of evil with the goodness of God by saying that God is indeed good, but in ways we cannot understand.