Thanks for the constructive criticism.
Do you just mean a correct view of reality?
Yes, but I didn’t want to mention the T word. There is only so much inferential distance you can cover in 400 words.
I didn’t want to mention the T word
A wise choice, probably :-) but you can also phrase it something like “consistent with what we see in reality”...
Thanks for the constructive criticism.
Yes, but I didn’t want to mention the T word. There is only so much inferential distance you can cover in 400 words.
A wise choice, probably :-) but you can also phrase it something like “consistent with what we see in reality”...