You were dropping a lot of unfamiliar terminology, the end result of which was failing utterly to communicate what your point was. If you want us to understand your point, you’re going to have to unpack most of your sentences.
(easy example: what does Christian NeoRationalist mean?)
Density. Yes my sentences are very dense. If I change that I would be in violation of my own constraints. Let me try this.
I assert and the Model asserts:
“We” are falsely dichotomous (?) in our use of the word technology. If a mechanism or machine is non carbon based then it is technological. If a mechanism or machine is organic it is not technological. I assert, that the existential difference between them is an illusion. The model describes a hierarchy that dispels the illusion.
Change of context.
All complexities/simplicities have inner or internal attributes and outer or external attributes. If the universe is a complexity/simplicity, then it follows that the universe too must have external and internal attributes.
I believe that the model asserts that There is a God and God gave rise to this rational complex universe. I am a new order Rationalist of the Christian sect.
Hence Christian Neo-Rationalist.
Would you share some of your reflections on Value and Complexity with me in the context of my previous assertion?
edit:
Maybe it would be helpful to assert that this false dichotomy applies equally to levers and pendulums. They are just different forms of the same thing.
You were dropping a lot of unfamiliar terminology, the end result of which was failing utterly to communicate what your point was. If you want us to understand your point, you’re going to have to unpack most of your sentences.
(easy example: what does Christian NeoRationalist mean?)
Density. Yes my sentences are very dense. If I change that I would be in violation of my own constraints. Let me try this. I assert and the Model asserts: “We” are falsely dichotomous (?) in our use of the word technology. If a mechanism or machine is non carbon based then it is technological. If a mechanism or machine is organic it is not technological. I assert, that the existential difference between them is an illusion. The model describes a hierarchy that dispels the illusion.
Change of context.
All complexities/simplicities have inner or internal attributes and outer or external attributes. If the universe is a complexity/simplicity, then it follows that the universe too must have external and internal attributes.
I believe that the model asserts that There is a God and God gave rise to this rational complex universe. I am a new order Rationalist of the Christian sect.
Hence Christian Neo-Rationalist.
Would you share some of your reflections on Value and Complexity with me in the context of my previous assertion?
edit: Maybe it would be helpful to assert that this false dichotomy applies equally to levers and pendulums. They are just different forms of the same thing.