Archive
Sequences
About
Search
Log In
Questions
Events
Shortform
Alignment Forum
AF Comments
Home
Featured
All
Tags
Recent
Comments
Gunnar_Zarncke comments on
E.T. Jaynes Probability Theory: The logic of Science I
Gunnar_Zarncke
28 Dec 2023 20:19 UTC
3
points
0
Also, the second $P(intact∣orc,X)$ should be $P(intact∣goblin,X)$
Back to top
Also, the second $P(intact∣orc,X)$ should be $P(intact∣goblin,X)$