Interesting research agenda, thanks for posting it!
Very minor question, mainly to see whether I’m misunderstanding something:
we will say that a two-player normal-form game with payoffs denoted as in Table 1 is a social dilemma if the payoffs satisfy these criteria:
[...]
2R>T+S (Mutual cooperation is better than randomizing between cooperation and defection);
But it looks to me like, in Table 1, “Chicken” doesn’t satisfy that criterion. 2*0 = 0, and −1 + 1 = 0, so 2R=T+S, rather than 2R being greater. Am I missing something? Or should that have been an “equal to or greater than” symbol?
Also, I spotted an apparent typo, in “Under what circumstances does mutual transparency or exacerbate commitment race dynamics”. I believe a word like “mitigate” is missing there.
Interesting research agenda, thanks for posting it!
Very minor question, mainly to see whether I’m misunderstanding something:
But it looks to me like, in Table 1, “Chicken” doesn’t satisfy that criterion. 2*0 = 0, and −1 + 1 = 0, so 2R=T+S, rather than 2R being greater. Am I missing something? Or should that have been an “equal to or greater than” symbol?
Also, I spotted an apparent typo, in “Under what circumstances does mutual transparency or exacerbate commitment race dynamics”. I believe a word like “mitigate” is missing there.