Where I disagree is that we 100% need a separate “information processing” and “inner listener” module.
I didn’t understand this part. Do you mean that EY thinks we need these two modules and you don’t think that, or the other way around?
(I think this is a generic problem that arises pretty much whenever someone uses this kind of phrasing, saying “Where I disagree is that X”. I can’t tell if they’re saying they believe X and the person they disagree with believes not-X, or the other way around. Sometimes I can tell from context. This time I couldn’t.)
I didn’t understand this part. Do you mean that EY thinks we need these two modules and you don’t think that, or the other way around?
(I think this is a generic problem that arises pretty much whenever someone uses this kind of phrasing, saying “Where I disagree is that X”. I can’t tell if they’re saying they believe X and the person they disagree with believes not-X, or the other way around. Sometimes I can tell from context. This time I couldn’t.)