It is opaque. If I’m reading it right, it’s a functionalist argument against the concept of qualia, much as Dennett makes here.
More or less. It’s about a half-step away from invoking occam’s razor to finish the job.
It is opaque. If I’m reading it right, it’s a functionalist argument against the concept of qualia, much as Dennett makes here.
More or less. It’s about a half-step away from invoking occam’s razor to finish the job.