Right. Or, you know, you could just pray and get your answers from the Ultimate Font of knowledge. I heard that source throws off all kinds of evidence of the validity of its claims.
The more charitable interpretation is that Silas is saying “Yeah, right, that would totally work. About as well as crossing your fingers and guessing.”
Right. Or, you know, you could just pray and get your answers from the Ultimate Font of knowledge. I heard that source throws off all kinds of evidence of the validity of its claims.
Umm … why is this relevant here?
I was taking calcsam’s purported epistemology and evidentiary standards for arguments seriously. I agree it was a bit “guerilla” though.
It is not relevant at all. It’s an ad hominem; calcsam is a theist. I have downvoted it.
The more charitable interpretation is that Silas is saying “Yeah, right, that would totally work. About as well as crossing your fingers and guessing.”
Which is still pretty shitty.
Not ad hominem, ad epistemologiam.