Second try: while it’s certainly possible that one can be called a misogynist* for asserting (some) innate differences between men and women, it’s also true that there’s such a thing as clear expressions of hostility towards women, and I’d say that Nietzsche engaged in them.
*I’m giving “asshole” a rest, as it’s just an expression of anger.
Second try: while it’s certainly possible that one can be called a misogynist* for asserting (some) innate differences between men and women, it’s also true that there’s such a thing as clear expressions of hostility towards women, and I’d say that Nietzsche engaged in them.
Ok, what do you mean by “hostility” because the example given in your link certainly doesn’t qualify by the definition I’m used to.
Sorry, is this supposed to refute my claimed definition?
Not as good a refutation as one might hope.
Second try: while it’s certainly possible that one can be called a misogynist* for asserting (some) innate differences between men and women, it’s also true that there’s such a thing as clear expressions of hostility towards women, and I’d say that Nietzsche engaged in them.
*I’m giving “asshole” a rest, as it’s just an expression of anger.
Ok, what do you mean by “hostility” because the example given in your link certainly doesn’t qualify by the definition I’m used to.