Yes, we seem to have quite different understandings of what these terms (“near”, “far”, “political”) mean.
An example of (erroneous) “near” reasoning in my usage would be: “Amanda is guilty because there had to be multiple attackers because there were so many wounds on the victim”.
Whereas an example of (erroneous) “far” reasoning would be: “Amanda is guilty because f**ck those arrogant imperialist Americans trying to tell us how to run our country”.
Yes, we seem to have quite different understandings of what these terms (“near”, “far”, “political”) mean.
An example of (erroneous) “near” reasoning in my usage would be: “Amanda is guilty because there had to be multiple attackers because there were so many wounds on the victim”.
Whereas an example of (erroneous) “far” reasoning would be: “Amanda is guilty because f**ck those arrogant imperialist Americans trying to tell us how to run our country”.