What sort of odds ratio would you assign to the evidence presented by the prosecution given the knowledge that it’s filtered?
I’m not sure what you mean by “odds ratio” and I don’t know exactly what evidence was presented by the prosecution, so it’s hard to say. My assessment of 90% is based on the evidence I am aware of.
but that it is not much stronger than the evidence that I would expect them to find against anyone else given a similar level of investigation
I disagree. I shared some of my arguments about my interpretation of the evidence in the last couple threads.
I’m not sure what you mean by “odds ratio” and I don’t know exactly what evidence was presented by the prosecution, so it’s hard to say. My assessment of 90% is based on the evidence I am aware of.
I disagree. I shared some of my arguments about my interpretation of the evidence in the last couple threads.