Asked by Galileo to look through his telescope at the newly discovered four moons of Jupiter, a representative of the pope answered: “I refuse to look at something which my religion tells me cannot exist.”—newscientist
I think this quotation actually comes not from a real papal representative but from Brecht’s play “Galileo”.
(Isn’t it obvious that this isn’t the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say? Especially not the sort of person who would be sent to Galileo by the Pope.)
(Isn’t it obvious that this isn’t the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say? Especially not the sort of person who would be sent to Galileo by the Pope.)
Isn’t it obvious that this isn’t the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say?
No. I’ve heard similar. (Although it actually felt uncomfortable to give that answer given that it could be seen as not-not supporting a co-aligned solider that we had decided to burn!)
I think wedrifid meant that e would being seen as supporting a false but favorable quote that everyone else was decrying for being false.
[Edited for spelling]
Some of Galileo’s critics argued that at least some of his observations were artifacts of the instrument he was using (the telescope) and even cited experimental evidence in their critiques (such as looking at objects that could be seen with the naked eye as well as through the telescope and observing anomalies like duplication or “halos” through the latter). This is simply standard scientific criticism, not religious nay saying. So, even if the quote is accurate it wasn’t necessarily representative of his critics.
The Jesuits of the Collegio Romano that were sent to meet with Galileo verified his observations by using his telescope, but disagreed with his interpretation of them. Therefore, it seems very unlikely that the quote is accurate.
Asked by Galileo to look through his telescope at the newly discovered four moons of Jupiter, a representative of the pope answered: “I refuse to look at something which my religion tells me cannot exist.”—newscientist
I think this quotation actually comes not from a real papal representative but from Brecht’s play “Galileo”.
(Isn’t it obvious that this isn’t the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say? Especially not the sort of person who would be sent to Galileo by the Pope.)
Shhh! That quote is a soldier for Our Side, don’t break it! ;)
Now should I upvote for the great use of irony, or down for abuses of logic? My joke detector is broken.
The smiley is there as the equivalent of Braille for the joke-blind.
No. I’ve heard similar. (Although it actually felt uncomfortable to give that answer given that it could be seen as not-not supporting a co-aligned solider that we had decided to burn!)
There is some doubt over the treatment Galileo actually got, and what for.
I think wedrifid meant that e would being seen as supporting a false but favorable quote that everyone else was decrying for being false. [Edited for spelling]
Yes, complete with television show spy talk lingo to extend the analogy.
The quote isn’t accurate. There was argument over what was being seen through the telescope, not about whether to look through it. Details from a guy who wrote a book on Galileo here.
Some of Galileo’s critics argued that at least some of his observations were artifacts of the instrument he was using (the telescope) and even cited experimental evidence in their critiques (such as looking at objects that could be seen with the naked eye as well as through the telescope and observing anomalies like duplication or “halos” through the latter). This is simply standard scientific criticism, not religious nay saying. So, even if the quote is accurate it wasn’t necessarily representative of his critics.
The Jesuits of the Collegio Romano that were sent to meet with Galileo verified his observations by using his telescope, but disagreed with his interpretation of them. Therefore, it seems very unlikely that the quote is accurate.
Probably, the quote is a kind of bullshit.