Have you read the post? It specifically says this is for big organizations, and not relevant to small ones (or by extension individuals).
The post lays out a decent argument for why organizations can’t maintain two priorities of roughly the same importance.
But I don’t see why that bars the possibility of secondary priorities that are clearly stated to be much less important?
I see what you’re saying—I thought you were referring to individual people. I’m pretty sure we all agree here and this is just a semantics thing.
Have you read the post? It specifically says this is for big organizations, and not relevant to small ones (or by extension individuals).
The post lays out a decent argument for why organizations can’t maintain two priorities of roughly the same importance.
But I don’t see why that bars the possibility of secondary priorities that are clearly stated to be much less important?
I see what you’re saying—I thought you were referring to individual people. I’m pretty sure we all agree here and this is just a semantics thing.