No, philosophers are more susceptible because most of them can’t recognize that “cannot be answered by evidence” means an answer can’t be obtained at all.
I would say both. Some things that philosophers think can’t be answered by evidence are in fact answered by evidence, such as whether 2 + 2 = 4.
I would say both. Some things that philosophers think can’t be answered by evidence are in fact answered by evidence, such as whether 2 + 2 = 4.