thomblake comments on Undiscriminating Skepticism

thomblake 24 Mar 2010 20:30 UTC
8 points

So before the 19th century a rationalist could not reasonably conclude that the atheistic position is correct?

Do you really take this to be a reasonable interpretation / inference based on what Morendil said?

I think we might just have to stop feeding the troll.
- brazil84 24 Mar 2010 21:13 UTC
  0 points
  Parent
  
  Do you really take this to be a reasonable interpretation / inference based on what Morendil said?
  
  Absolutely. The other poster claimed, in essence, that scientific studies are necessary to reach the atheistic conclusion. The implication is that before such studies were done, one could not reach that conclusion.