CFAR can achieve its goal of creating effective, rational do-gooders by taking existing do-gooders and making them more effective and rational.
I wasn’t aware that this was the strategy; perhaps I read the original post too quickly.
This is why they offer scholarships to existing do-gooders.
Well are they attempting to turn non-do-gooders into do-gooders?
That they don’t turn people in general into do-gooders does not constitute a failure of the whole mission. These activities support the mission without directly fulfilling it.
Perhaps, but that strikes me as a dangerous first step towards a kind of mission creep. Towards a scenario (3) or (4).
CFAR is creating an alumni network to create benefits on top of increased effectiveness and rationality.
I wasn’t aware that this was the strategy; perhaps I read the original post too quickly.
Well are they attempting to turn non-do-gooders into do-gooders?
Perhaps, but that strikes me as a dangerous first step towards a kind of mission creep. Towards a scenario (3) or (4).
Same problem.