[...] requires each party to assume the other is completely rational and honest. [/..] But assuming that the other party is in fact totally rational is just silly.
Assuming honesty is pretty problematical, too. In real-world disputes, participants are likely to disagree about what constitutes evidence (“the Bible says..”), aren’t rational, and suspect each others honesty.
Assuming honesty is pretty problematical, too. In real-world disputes, participants are likely to disagree about what constitutes evidence (“the Bible says..”), aren’t rational, and suspect each others honesty.