Isn’t there a stereotype whereby men prefer women who play by The Rules, which apparently consist of guidelines for emotional manipulation? That counts as bitchy in my book.
Also, can someone explain the “patient male friend” part of stereotype? I think it’s one of these cases:
Nice Guy never expresses interest; Woman assumes he’s happy with friendship, including his role as confidant. He wonders why she never chooses him… because he assumes telepathy on her part?
Nice Guy hits on Woman repeatedly despite constant rejections on her part. She keeps having him as a friend and telling him about her relationships… because she can’t get a male friend who’s genuinely happy with that?
Nice Guy expresses interest, gets rejected. He genuinely wants the friendship but doesn’t ask “please don’t tell me about your relationships while I’m carrying a torch for you”… because he doesn’t know how to do that without sinking the friendship as well?
Nice Guy expresses interest, gets rejected. He won’t be satisfied with the friendship but doesn’t walk away… because he hopes Woman will magically change her mind?
It occurs to me that a common factor might be that the two of them are both highly pessimistic about relationships—neither of them is looking for someone they can be happy with.
Woman seems to expect to be happy with her boyfriends (after all, she doesn’t date people she isn’t attracted to, whom she would be unhappy with). Nice Guy may or may not be looking for someone he can be happy with in parallel with pursuing Woman.
I may be too hard on her—I was doing the jump of assuming that if she really wanted to be happy, she’d be using more efficient selection methods, but that could be another of those bad advice schemas.
I may be too hard on her—I was doing the jump of assuming that if she really wanted to be happy, she’d be using more efficient selection methods, but that could be another of those bad advice schemas.
Actually, you’re missing the part where her selection method may well be optimal, given her goals. She gets excitement, sex, and drama from the “jerk” boyfriends, and companionship, emotional, and other kinds of support from her orbiter(s). (PUA terminology for guys who hang around a girl hoping she’ll realize he’s perfect and stop dating the jerks.)
This is such a common thing that it seems evolutionarily optimized. Enough orbiters occasionally luck out to make it a viable minority strategy for males, and the win for the females is obvious.
It’s only if you think idealistically (“far”) that you’d even be surprised by the frequency with which this occurs.
(Also, one thing that sometimes happens is that the orbiter, after getting his lucky moment, actually becomes more confident about expressing his interest in women and quits orbiting them. Everybody wins!)
Isn’t there a stereotype whereby men prefer women who play by The Rules, which apparently consist of guidelines for emotional manipulation? That counts as bitchy in my book.
Also, can someone explain the “patient male friend” part of stereotype? I think it’s one of these cases:
Nice Guy never expresses interest; Woman assumes he’s happy with friendship, including his role as confidant. He wonders why she never chooses him… because he assumes telepathy on her part?
Nice Guy hits on Woman repeatedly despite constant rejections on her part. She keeps having him as a friend and telling him about her relationships… because she can’t get a male friend who’s genuinely happy with that?
Nice Guy expresses interest, gets rejected. He genuinely wants the friendship but doesn’t ask “please don’t tell me about your relationships while I’m carrying a torch for you”… because he doesn’t know how to do that without sinking the friendship as well?
Nice Guy expresses interest, gets rejected. He won’t be satisfied with the friendship but doesn’t walk away… because he hopes Woman will magically change her mind?
It occurs to me that a common factor might be that the two of them are both highly pessimistic about relationships—neither of them is looking for someone they can be happy with.
Woman seems to expect to be happy with her boyfriends (after all, she doesn’t date people she isn’t attracted to, whom she would be unhappy with). Nice Guy may or may not be looking for someone he can be happy with in parallel with pursuing Woman.
I may be too hard on her—I was doing the jump of assuming that if she really wanted to be happy, she’d be using more efficient selection methods, but that could be another of those bad advice schemas.
Actually, you’re missing the part where her selection method may well be optimal, given her goals. She gets excitement, sex, and drama from the “jerk” boyfriends, and companionship, emotional, and other kinds of support from her orbiter(s). (PUA terminology for guys who hang around a girl hoping she’ll realize he’s perfect and stop dating the jerks.)
This is such a common thing that it seems evolutionarily optimized. Enough orbiters occasionally luck out to make it a viable minority strategy for males, and the win for the females is obvious.
It’s only if you think idealistically (“far”) that you’d even be surprised by the frequency with which this occurs.
(Also, one thing that sometimes happens is that the orbiter, after getting his lucky moment, actually becomes more confident about expressing his interest in women and quits orbiting them. Everybody wins!)
It is all of those cases, except it is also stipulated that the description must be cast in a more positive light.