I’m going to go with “rationality” if it counts as a skill and we are talking about deviation from the mean, not absolute value, where things like object permanence probably take precedence.
Breaking down rationality and focusing on my particular areas of strength, I’d go with the ability to notice confusion, clarify questions, and entertain a hypothesis to the point of serious investigation without becoming highly attached to it, and the sort of extreme materialism that dissolves Enlightenment era superstitions like a unified self and does so not as theoretical knowledge but as an everyday element of experienced life.
Non-attachment of all sorts really is quite useful though, from the ability to drop hypotheses to the ability to reject a long-term hobby (such as reading fiction) or interpersonal pattern (say arguing) as no longer educational or enjoyable enough to justify serious continued attention and then actually give it up or reduce participation (indulgence accepts naive assumptions about habits being fun) to a rewarding level.
Alternatively, it could result in falling through the floor, and being trapped in the Earth’s core for all of eternity… Or until you die, whichever comes sooner.
I’m going to go with “rationality” if it counts as a skill and we are talking about deviation from the mean, not absolute value, where things like object permanence probably take precedence.
Breaking down rationality and focusing on my particular areas of strength, I’d go with the ability to notice confusion, clarify questions, and entertain a hypothesis to the point of serious investigation without becoming highly attached to it, and the sort of extreme materialism that dissolves Enlightenment era superstitions like a unified self and does so not as theoretical knowledge but as an everyday element of experienced life.
Non-attachment of all sorts really is quite useful though, from the ability to drop hypotheses to the ability to reject a long-term hobby (such as reading fiction) or interpersonal pattern (say arguing) as no longer educational or enjoyable enough to justify serious continued attention and then actually give it up or reduce participation (indulgence accepts naive assumptions about habits being fun) to a rewarding level.
“Object permanence” is a skill?
Of your parietal cortex, one assumes.
Oh, I see. The ability to perceive/understand the permanence of objects, not the ability to be a permanent object.
Though I suppose the ability to not be a permanent object might be useful for e.g. walking through walls.
Unless it meant that you ceased existing at all, of course.
Alternatively, it could result in falling through the floor, and being trapped in the Earth’s core for all of eternity… Or until you die, whichever comes sooner.