If this gets promoted, it will make an interesting case study in what it takes for a completely off-topic link reference to get promoted.
A link about how people are attempting to be less wrong is off-topic on LessWrong? /me is puzzled.
Even more specifically, it’s an article about people using math to make better decisions, which is kind of at the core of LW’s raison d’etre, AFAICT.
I agree; this seems to me to be very much what LW (not saying “we” because I’m not really in the community) ought to be discussing.
You should try to find a better scientific institution for testing article promotion hypotheses.
If this gets promoted, it will make an interesting case study in what it takes for a completely off-topic link reference to get promoted.
A link about how people are attempting to be less wrong is off-topic on LessWrong? /me is puzzled.
Even more specifically, it’s an article about people using math to make better decisions, which is kind of at the core of LW’s raison d’etre, AFAICT.
I agree; this seems to me to be very much what LW (not saying “we” because I’m not really in the community) ought to be discussing.
You should try to find a better scientific institution for testing article promotion hypotheses.