The Economist lists Singapore as a hybrid regime with elements of authoritarianism and democracy. It ranks in its democracy index below Malaysia and Indonesia. Thus I do not think it is ‘arguably the best functioning democracy in the world’.
It functions well and it is a democracy. I didn’t mean to imply it achieved any unusual height of democracy. Rather, it achieves other things very well.
Fair enough. The author’s claim was that any sufficiently democratic organizations works in the interest of its members. If an authoritarian regime works to the benefits of the public it is by virtue of a benevolent dictator that has nevertheless to follow the rules of power.
Singapore, arguably the best functioning democracy in the world, pays its head of state millions of dollars.. I realise this is probably still not enough.
The Economist lists Singapore as a hybrid regime with elements of authoritarianism and democracy. It ranks in its democracy index below Malaysia and Indonesia. Thus I do not think it is ‘arguably the best functioning democracy in the world’.
It functions well and it is a democracy. I didn’t mean to imply it achieved any unusual height of democracy. Rather, it achieves other things very well.
Fair enough. The author’s claim was that any sufficiently democratic organizations works in the interest of its members. If an authoritarian regime works to the benefits of the public it is by virtue of a benevolent dictator that has nevertheless to follow the rules of power.