Sure, overreaction would be an epistemic failure—if it were genuine. But the whole point of this idea is that it’s not. It’s faked, based on correctly realizing that not overreacting is dangerous.
That’s not to say it isn’t a failure mode, just not an epistemic one. In any case, I was just curious if I had missed some relevant epistemic failure. Tapping out, unless you think there is such an additional failure and I’m just an idiot.
Sure, overreaction would be an epistemic failure—if it were genuine. But the whole point of this idea is that it’s not. It’s faked, based on correctly realizing that not overreacting is dangerous.
That’s not to say it isn’t a failure mode, just not an epistemic one. In any case, I was just curious if I had missed some relevant epistemic failure. Tapping out, unless you think there is such an additional failure and I’m just an idiot.